Poll: Fourth of July second only to Christmas as America’s top holiday

Poll: Fourth of July second only to Christmas as America's top holiday

A majority of Americans say Independence Day is one of America’s top holidays.
Only Christmas (58%) tops the Fourth of July (52%) as the country’s top holiday, according to new polling from Napolitan News Service. Independence Day commemorates the signing of the nation’s Declaration of Independence from Great Britain on July 4, 1776. Next year will mark the 250th anniversary of the historic event.
Rounding out the top five American holidays are Veterans Day (47%), Memorial Day (44%) and Thanksgiving (31%), according to the poll of 1,000 registered voters conducted online June 25-26 by pollster Scott Rasmussen.
Nearly three in four Americans are likely to do something to celebrate Independence Day, according to the poll, with 46% very likely and 28% somewhat likely.
Among all voters surveyed, 56% said they planned to watch fireworks; 51% will participate in a cookout; 24% said they would set off firecrackers at home; 22% said they’d watch or participate in a parade; 17% will go to the beach or a lake; and 10% will sing patriotic songs.
The same poll asked those surveyed if they are proud to be an American, with 84% saying they are and 9% saying they are not.
When asked, “Are America’s best days still to come, or have they come and gone?”, 55% responded they are still to come, 27% said they have come and gone, and 18% were not sure.
Field work for the survey was conducted by RMG Research, Inc. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.1.

Read More

Housing funding cut in Illinois budget as homelessness increases

Housing funding cut in Illinois budget as homelessness increases

Capitol News Illinois

Article Summary

Illinois’ fiscal year 2026 budget reduced funding for programs serving homeless people by more than $14 million from the previous year.
JB Pritzker’s “Home Illinois” initiative aimed at reaching “functional zero” homelessness saw a $26.6 million cut.
That program was launched in 2022 and had previously been on a steady upward funding trend.
Advocates worry the reductions and potential federal cuts will exacerbate homelessness in Illinois, which increased 116% in 2024, according to state data.

This summary was written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.

The number of homeless people in Illinois is rising, but the state’s spending on homeless prevention and other housing programs is headed in the other direction.
Facing a tight budget year with constrained spending and limited natural revenue growth, the $55.1 billion fiscal year 2026 budget that took effect July 1 reduces total funding for housing programs by more than $14 million, including Pritzker’s signature initiative designed to eliminate homelessness in Illinois.
“Last year homelessness increased 116% in the state of Illinois,” Doug Kenshol, co-founder of the Illinois Shelter Alliance, told Capitol News Illinois. “To be in the midst of this crisis and then have the state cut funding was beyond disappointing.”
Discretionary spending rose by less than 1% in the FY26 budget, according to the governor’s office, despite total spending increasing by $2 billion. That minimal spending growth led lawmakers to reduce several programs.
“Is it enough? No, it isn’t … we know that homelessness is an existential crisis, and the state of Illinois takes this seriously,” Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, who serves on a state homeless prevention task force, told Capitol News Illinois. “We have a really bold vision for ending homelessness and we’re going to continue down that path.”
Spending reductions
Pritzker first established a task force by executive order in 2021 that would create a plan for “Home Illinois” to reduce homelessness in the state to “functional zero” — where homelessness is temporary and people without housing can quickly obtain housing resources. The executive order did not set a date for the state to reach functional zero, and funding for the Home Illinois is declining by $26.6 million in FY26.
Pritzker’s administration had previously targeted housing programs for substantial increases in recent years. The FY26 budget appropriated $263.7 million for Home Illinois, down from $290.3 million in FY25. That was a $90 million increase from FY24, when the program received $200.3 million in its first year after Pritzker signed legislation in 2023 codifying the task force and Home Illinois program.
Read more: Pritzker signs $55.1B state budget reliant on $700 million of new taxes
Among the decreased spending in Home Illinois is a $25 million reduction to the Court-Based Rental Assistance Program that provides financial aid to people facing evictions. Other programs saw steady or increased funding, including shelters, which rose to fund Chicago’s One System Initiative that integrates migrants into the city’s typical shelter system.
Spending on housing programs is also down overall, according to the advocacy group Housing Action Illinois. While some housing programs saw increases that offset reductions to Home Illinois, total spending on housing programs is down by $14.6 million in the FY26 budget, to $354 million. Pritzker’s proposed budget had called for a $7.6 million decrease.
“FY26 is largely a maintenance year for the state budget,” an Illinois Department of Human Services spokesperson said in a statement. “We remain as committed as ever to advancing strategies that prevent and end homelessness across Illinois.”
Johnson said the spending reduction is “temporary” and the state is still working toward long-term goals that would require more funding.
“The state is trying to do the best it can with limited resources,” Housing Action Illinois Policy Director Bob Palmer said in an interview.
Some of the avenues lawmakers used to fund programs also divert funding away from one area in favor of another, Palmer said. For example, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund is supposed to provide funding for new permanent rental housing, but money in the fund is also being used to increase funding for emergency or transitional housing.
“We were in a way glad to see that increase but also feeling conflicted because it’s taking money from another important housing resource,” Palmer said. “We had been advocating for that increase to come from general revenue funds.”
Read more: Illinois Shelter Alliance calls for $100M state funding boost to fight homelessness
Funding for the emergency and transitional housing program increased by $7 million, a small win for advocates, but nowhere near the $40 million increase sought by the Illinois Shelter Alliance. The group wanted lawmakers to increase funding by $100 million overall for housing programs.
Palmer also worried proposed federal cuts to rental assistance programs will put additional strain on the state’s budget.
Homelessness continues to grow
The spending reductions come as homelessness in Illinois continues to rise despite the new program.
The latest data on homelessness in Illinois from an October report by a Department of Human Services task force shows the state had 25,787 unhoused people on the night of the annual “point in time” count in January 2024 — a 116% increase from 2023.
The increase is largely driven by migrants who have been sent to Illinois by other states such as Texas. Of those without housing in January 2024, 13,891 were new arrivals. However, non-migrant homelessness is still on the rise, increasing 22% in 2024.
Homelessness is also increasing throughout the state. It’s up 207% since 2020 in Chicago, while DuPage and St. Clair counties were the only places in Illinois to see a decline over that time.
“You can argue that we can always do better, but Illinois is on the right path,” Johnson said.
Despite homelessness increasing since Home Illinois was established, Kenshol said the program is making a difference.
“They’ve created some great programs and they’ve gotten funds distributed and a lot of housing and a lot of shelter has been created, but we have to sustain that effort and we need to keep making incremental increases because we’re not there yet,” he said.
Data backs that up, according to IDHS. The Court-Based Rental Assistance Program, which received a substantial cut this year, has helped 7,500 households. And more than 18,000 people were served by Home Illinois in the first half of FY25 — 10,000 more than IDHS’ prior homelessness prevention program helped in FY22.
The problem, according to advocates and IDHS, is rapidly growing housing costs that make finding permanent housing and affording rent more unreachable for more people. A report last month from the Illinois Economic Policy Institute found Illinois needs 142,000 more housing units to meet the current demand for homes.
Finding more resources
Data in the task force’s annual report that provides a road map for Home Illinois shows service providers still need substantial resources to make a dent in homelessness. The state has more than 23,000 beds and housing units for homeless people, but needs about 27,000 more.
The task force, which includes advocates, lawmakers and top leaders in state agencies, says the problem will continue to grow if these resources aren’t addressed.
“The longer it takes to meet these targets, the more resources will be needed to reach functional zero as homelessness is a dynamic systems problem, or, in other words, annual unmet need for shelter and housing can be expected to increase each year that the need is unmet,” the report said.
Palmer agreed.
“If we’re taking the plan to prevent and end homelessness in Illinois seriously, we need to be providing the increased resources to eliminate that shortage … otherwise we’re just managing homelessness at its current level,” he said.
Palmer said lawmakers should be increasing funding for housing no matter what the state’s budget situation is because housing insecurity can be a root cause for other issues that cost the state more money, such as health problems.
Increasing funding for shelters alone also isn’t enough, said Kenshol, the Shelter Aliance co-founder. A lack of funding for affordable permanent housing leaves people stuck in the shelter system, which means growing rental assistance programs to help prevent people from being forced into shelters should be a budget priority, he said.
In a $55.1 billion budget, Kenshol argued the state should be able to find the money to increase funding each year for housing programs.
“As a society, as voters, as elected officials, we make different choices. We turn our backs on the people who are desperate and at risk of perishing and instead we invest in other things,” Kenshol said. “My values suggest that we should put caring for the least of these first.”
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.


The post Housing funding cut in Illinois budget as homelessness increases appeared first on Capitol News Illinois.

Read More

Trump rallies Iowa State Fair for kickoff of ‘America 250’

Trump rallies Iowa State Fair for kickoff of 'America 250'

Fresh off the heels of the passage of President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill,’ he kicked off the start of the nation’s 250th birthday in Iowa.
The Iowa State Fair is prominently known in political circles as the litmus test for presidential candidates, but Thursday night’s rally in Des Moines struck a celebratory tone.
The president touted his ‘big, beautiful bill,” claiming “there could be no better birthday present for America.”
“With this bill, every major promise I made to the people of Iowa in 2024 became a promise kept,” Trump told the crowd. “The country is on a winning streak.”
The president highlighted several provisions in the bill, including no tax on tips, increasing border security and eliminating the “death tax.”
“Just as I promised, we’re making no tax on tips, no tax on overtime and no tax on social security…very importantly for Iowa, this bill rescues over 2 million family farms from the so-called estate tax, or the death tax,” the president told the crowd.
Trump touted a record low number of border crossings while addressing the issues of migrant farm workers, indicating Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem will come up with a solution. The president added that his administration would put “farmers in charge.”
“The golden age is upon us,” said Trump.
“We are officially launching ‘America 250’—an enormously, year-long, nationwide celebration of our heritage, our flag, and our glorious American freedom,” the president announced, teasing the crowd that more details will be released in the coming weeks on the nation’s 250th birthday.
Trump announced the “Great American State Fair,” which will include a large celebration next year on the National Mall featuring all 50 states.
The president highlighted a few events as part of the celebration, including a UFC fight on the grounds of the White House—the first of its kind at the president’s house. In addition, he announced the “Patriot Games,” which will be comprised of top high school athletes from all 50 states.
Trump also said foreign tourists will be charged more to enter national parks in an effort to fund improvements.
The president concluded his speech by telling the crowd to “fight, fight, fight” while underscoring his promise to ‘Make America Great Again.’
Trump’s kickoff for “America 250” comes ahead of a huge celebration for the Fourth of July in Washington, to include flyovers featuring B-2 Stealth Bombers like the ones used to target Iranian nuclear facilities. As part of the celebration, the president will also sign the ‘big, beautiful bill’ at the White House, prior to a large fireworks show over the National Mall.

Read More

‘One big, beautiful bill’ passage evokes praise, doomsday predictions

'One big, beautiful bill' passage evokes praise, doomsday predictions

The Thursday passage of President Donald Trump’s multitrillion-dollar ‘big, beautiful bill’ drew both praise and panic from lawmakers and budget organizations.
The massive budget reconciliation bill, which will add an estimated net $4.1 trillion to the primary deficit over the next decade, implements the bulk of the president’s policy agenda, including the codification of his 2017 tax cuts.
It also hikes the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, implements cost-saving reforms to Medicaid and SNAP, funds construction of a southern border wall, phases out solar and wind subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act, and boosts fossil fuel energy production, among other things.
House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, called the bill “the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history.”
“This Big Beautiful Bill delivers the greatest single investment in border security and national defense; the largest tax cuts for families and small businesses; the most significant commitment to unlocking America’s energy resources; and the largest reduction in spending in the history of the United States,” Arrington stated, referring to the bills’ $1.7 trillion in savings.
Republican leaders had a difficult time getting all Republicans on board with the bill, particularly the House Freedom Caucus, who objected to the Senate’s controversial and unprecedented use of the current policy baseline that papered over the cost of permanent tax cut extension.
The Senate-amended bill eventually passed the House in a 218-214 vote, as The Center Square reported. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., was the only Republican to vote no on the bill.
“Although there were some conservative wins in the budget reconciliation bill (OBBBA), I voted No on final passage because it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates,” Massie posted on X.
The majority of budget watchdogs share Massie’s concerns, particularly over the use of the current policy baseline to score the cost of the tax cuts – a move that forever changes budget reconciliation precedent.
“Congress has put our country’s economic well-being in great danger and raised the risk of a serious debt crisis,” Carolyn Bordeaux from Concord Action said in a statement. “In the process of passing this bill, Congress has broken the budget process and shattered vital, longstanding norms designed to ensure a sober, responsible approach to policymaking.”
The national debt is currently $36 trillion and is projected to surpass $50 trillion in 10 years.
Democrats, all of whom voted against the bill, unleashed criticism on social media following the legislation’s passage.
Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., called the bill “a grave turning point” for the country and “a disgrace.” Rep. Jimmy Panetta, D-Calif., dubbed it “the largest self-inflicted wounds to working families and to our economy in our nation’s history.”
“They’ll regret this vote,” Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., said, referring to his Republican colleagues.
The bill now heads to Trump’s desk for his signature on Friday, July 4, meeting Republicans’ self-imposed Independence Day deadline.
“Congrats to everyone. At times I even doubted we’d get it done by July 4!” Vice President J.D. Vance posted on X. “But now we’ve delivered big tax cuts and the resources necessary to secure the border. Promises made, promises kept!”

Read More

CA data: just one Palisades brush clearance before fire

CA data: just one Palisades brush clearance before fire

State data shows the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention carried out only one brush clearance operation in the Pacific Palisades before the deadly Palisades Fire killed 12 Americans and destroyed 6,837 structures, highlighting the state’s slow progress in forest management.
This single Cal Fire-funded fuel reduction operation in Cal Fire’s database covering 2023 to the present involved mastication of 184 acres of scrubland across the over 75,000-acre Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority between November and December 2024. This operation focused on the border between the coastal community of the Pacific Palisades and the slightly more inland Brentwood community in MRCA’s Westridge-Canyonback Park along Mandeville Canyon Road, and along the Bel-Air, eastern side of the San Diego Freeway.
The 23,488-acre Palisades Fire never made it to the San Diego Freeway, and was stopped on the western side of Mandeville Canyon, suggesting the operation may have played a role in stopping the fire from spreading further east through the Santa Monica Mountains.
But within the immediate Palisades area, however, CalFire’s MCRA mastication operation was only conducted on a thin sliver in Temescal Gateway Park immediately around the base of Temescal Fire Road, but not to the east or west, or even further up the road, leaving the entire Palisades community vulnerable to fire — including the treated area, which ultimately completely burned.
Gov. Gavin Newsom, meanwhile, claims California is doing its fair share and urging the federal government to step up its fire prevention efforts.
“It’s time for Trump to put his money where his mouth is. California has done more than our fair share of ‘raking’ the forests, now the federal government has to do its part to Make America Rake Again,” said Newsom in a July 1 statement. “We’re doing all we can to protect communities from catastrophic wildfire, will President Trump?”
Southern California’s coastal areas are characterized by the chaparral ecosystem, which is defined by winter rains that produce spring blooms that dry out over the summer and feed fall fires. These fires leave nutrients for post-rain blooms in a cycle that dominated California until European development and adoption of fire suppression as fire policy.
Researchers estimate approximately 1.8 million acres of California land burned every year before 1800. With the state 42.2 million hectares large, this means the entire state’s equivalent of land burned every 23 years.
Historians note that the indigenous populations adopted prescriptive burn tactics of their own, with the North Fork Mono Tribe adopting 30-year burn cycles in which three or more burns are conducted in an area during the first 10 years, with just one burn over the next 20 years.
As a result of practices like these and natural occurrences like lightning strikes that were able to unfold, California forest density was approximately half of what it is now, resulting in fewer but larger trees. These larger trees were not only more fire resistant due to their size, but refrained from drying out due to less competition and limited erosion. They were also less likely to spread fire from treetop to treetop, making the land more resilient to fire overall.
While prescribed burns are considered most effective for managing overgrowth, mastication, or the feeding of brush and smaller trees into mulching machines, can also reduce fire spread and intensity as part of a broader fuels management strategy.
According to the state of California, approximately one-third, or a million acres, of state-managed land is at “high risk from uncontrolled wildfire.” The state said as many as 15 million acres of land in California is in need of treatment.
Cal Fire’s project dashboard shows it funded 141,061 acres of fuels reduction between July 2023 and June 2024, and 123,488 acres between July 2023 and May 2024. (June data is not yet available.) At this rate, it would take about seven years to clear the forest management backlog on state lands, not including the new lands added to the state’s backlog each year.
Cal Fire’s reports note that treated acres do not denote the total number of acres that have been successfully cleared, but that “there can be multiple discrete Treatment Areas within a Project, and Treatments may contain multiple overlapping activities.” That means if one area is thinned, then pruned, then piled, then burned, an area can contribute multiple times its size toward the treatment total.
Thus, while the state reports it has completed 51,286 acres of prescribed burns — a milestone exceeding the state’s 50,000-acre goal — and 68,347 acres of fuels reduction in the 2024-2025 fiscal year, it’s likely many of those acres have been counted more than once, obfuscating the real scale of the state’s brush clearance efforts.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s then-record $298 billion budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year notably cut $3 million from Cal Fire’s Forest Health Program, $35 million from stewardship programs of state-managed land, $5 million from prescribed fire and hand crews, and $28 million from conservancy projects, which likely accounted for some of the apparent forest treatment decline between the the 2023-2024 and the 2024-2025 fiscal years.
When Newsom came into office in 2019, the state was spending $200 million per year on wildfire prevention. The 2020-2021 budget increased funding to $536 million, and the 2021-2022 budget increased funding again to a record $988 million. Since then, however, funding has declined, with funding falling to $600 million in the 2022-2023 fiscal year, remaining steady for the 2023-2024 fiscal year, then declining to $543 million in the 2024-2025 fiscal year, and now to just $210 million for the 2025-2026 fiscal year.
This $210 million represents a relative decline since 2019 due to inflation — to keep up with inflation, the state would have had to have allocated $250 million this year.
Republican leaders have advocated that the state maintain a new wildfire prevention baseline of $1 billion per year, which a new working paper from Resources For the Future, whose lead author is a former U.S. Forestry Service senior researcher, suggests could eliminate the state’s highest-risk backlog in just five years.
Resources For the Future, an independent research institute, estimates it would cost approximately $17 billion to treat all of California’s lands at high risk of wildfire, finding mechanical thinning costing an average of $577 per acre, and prescribed burns $170 per acre based on U.S. Forestry Service data.
Should the state focus only on the highest-risk areas at the wildland-urban-interface where the risk of death and destruction from wildfire is the highest, RFF says treating these highest-risk 8.7 million acres would cost $5 billion.
RFF notes that these costs are based on national data, and do not count costly permitting or environmental review costs, or factor that significant scaling, and thus increased demand for labor and equipment, could raise treatment costs.
With the University of Chicago estimating the state’s 2018 record blazes caused $148.5 billion in losses, and the UCLA estimating the January fires cost as much as $164 billion, treating every acre of at-risk land in California could still cost significantly less than one catastrophic blaze.
Nonetheless, with the state starting to face budget pressures despite a record $321 billion budget, it’s unclear what other programs the state might be willing to cut to prioritize wildfire prevention.
Gabriel Kirkpatrick Mann, a seasoned wildfire documentarian who embedded with Cal Fire’s elite hotshot unit for six years to produce Hotshot, emphasizes the critical role of strategic fuel clearance in protecting communities.
“The entire forest could turn to moon dust, but if we have good fuel clearance around our neighborhood, it won’t matter,” Mann told The Center Square. “We saw this clearly on the Silverado Fire in 2020, which had the same conditions as the Palisades Fire, when 85 mile per hour winds pushed the fire straight into Orchard Hills, but because they had a 200-foot greenbelt of mulch and succulents, the fire fell to its knees.
“Contrast that with the Palisades, where you have a rats’ nest of fuels right up against people’s homes,” continued Mann. “Far different outcome.”
While the Silverado Fire in coastal Orange County burned 13,390 acres — a little less than half the size of the Palisades Fire — only five structures were destroyed, and no civilians died.
Despite the state’s wildfire prevention challenges, Newsom has leaned on the state’s efforts to go on the media offensive, hosting a “Make America Rake Again” press conference on Tuesday to unveil a model executive order for President Donald Trump to sign to improve national wildfire prevention efforts.
The model order calls for the federal government to match state and local forest management and firefighting capabilities, and reallocate funding to achieve this objective.
California Republican leaders responded by noting the state’s minimal fire prevention efforts relative to its budget — and the state’s challenge — and the decreases in fire prevention funding since the 2021-2022 fiscal year.
“Gavin Newsom has cut wildfire prevention funds every year since 2021. In 2021, myself and many other members of the legislature had to damn near shame him into a record investment of a billion dollars — this was in the aftermath of the Dixie Fire that devastated my district,” said Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher, R-East Nicolaus. “Every year since then, in Gavin’s budgets, he has slashed the funding, including in this year’s budget, in 2025, where he allocated only $200 million toward wildfire prevention while he’s allocating $12 billion for health care for illegal immigrants.”
“In the aftermath of these devastating fires in Los Angeles and these devastating fires that have hit my area, that have hit many parts of California, $200 million out of a $321 billion budget,” continued Gallagher. “And he still has not met the [joint federal and state] goal of 500,000 acres treated a year — he committed to that under the first Trump administration … he hasn’t met that goal at all.”
According to CalFire, 96,994 acres have burned this year, with 3,290 wildfires, 30 fatalities, and 16,306 structures destroyed across the state, with 17 fires still ongoing at the start of the summer fire season.

Read More

America celebrates 249 years of independence

America celebrates 249 years of independence

Fireworks, parades, and military flyovers will happen across the country in celebration of 249 years since America declared its independence from England through the Declaration of Independence.
In Washington, D.C., the B-2 bomber pilots who carried out the strike against nuclear missile facilities in Iran are expected to fly over the White House as part of celebrations for the holiday.
President Donald Trump confirmed the bomber pilot’s appearance in a Fox News interview.
Celebrations in the nation’s capitol will also include a parade down the heart of the city, capped off by a fireworks display on both sides of the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool at the National Mall.
Across the country, festivities are also taking place to celebrate 249 years of American independence.
In South Dakota, presidential reenactors gather at Mount Rushmore to honor Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. The reenactors will sign autographs, answer questions and interact with visitors throughout the day.
New York City boasts Macy’s 49th annual fireworks show with 80,000 shells of fireworks planned to be launch over the Brooklyn bridge in this year’s festivities.
On the West Coast, Huntington Beach, California, hosts a celebration that brings together more than 500,000 people annually.
In what is dubbed “the largest Independence Day west of the Mississippi,” the town sets up a 2.5 mile route down the Pacific Coast Highway for visitors to enjoy. The celebrations conclude with a fireworks display over the ocean.
Independence Day celebrations in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, start with a pancake breakfast in the town square, followed by a parade featuring music, horses, roller skaters and classic cars. The day wraps up with music and fireworks overlooking the Teton Mountains.
In downtown Nashville, artists from across the country celebrate America’s independence while fireworks are coordinated to a live performance from the Nashville symphony.
Philadelphia’s parade starts at Independence Hall, where the second Continental Congress met to sign the Declaration of Independence. 249 years later, the city honors American independence with a parade through the heart of downtown.
The parade features marching bands, dance performances and the debut of the first parade float set for the 2026 parade, celebrating 250 years of American independence.

Read More

Committee Rejects Troy Township Solar Projects Amid Strong Local Opposition

The Will County Land Use and Development Committee recommended denial for two controversial commercial solar energy projects in Troy Township on Thursday, following a wave of opposition from local municipalities, school districts, and state officials. The projects, proposed by developer Kevin Human of New Leaf Energy on behalf of landowner Shorewood Grain Farmers LLC, sought…

Read More

Controversial DuPage Township Rezoning for Outdoor Storage Advances

A contentious proposal to rezone a 20-acre parcel in DuPage Township from agricultural (A-1) to heavy industrial (I-3) for an outdoor vehicle storage facility narrowly passed the Will County Land Use and Development Committee on Thursday, following a lengthy and heated debate. The case, ZC-25-052, concerns a property at 13141 S. High Road, owned by…

Read More

Residents Allege Health Crises, Violations from Peotone Grain Facility

Two residents of unincorporated Peotone delivered emotional testimony to the Will County Land Use and Development Committee Thursday, alleging that a neighboring grain facility is causing severe health problems and environmental damage with little to no oversight from county or state agencies. Tracy Henning and Chris Strabel, residents at a property next to a Scoular…

Read More

Health Department May Seek Property Tax Increase to Maintain Critical Services

The Will County Health Department is grappling with significant budget shortfalls as multiple federal grants have been terminated or reduced, potentially forcing the agency to seek additional property tax revenue to maintain essential public health services. Elizabeth Bilotta, Executive Director of the Will County Health Department, told the Public Health & Safety Committee Wednesday that…

Read More