Texas legislature advances ‘Mayorkas model’ providing limited border cooperation

The Texas legislature on Saturday advanced a bill that authorizes limited support for Trump administration border security enforcement.
After SB 8, filed by state Sen. Charles Schwertner, R-Georgetown, passed the Senate, a substitute bill passed the House filed by Rep. David Spiller, R-Jacksboro, which the Senate rejected. A conference committee released a revised bill on Saturday.
It only applies to “certain sheriffs” that operate jails or enter into contracts with vendors that operate jails, according to the bill language. It doesn’t apply to state agencies or police departments. It doesn’t respond to a Trump administration request for all law enforcement officials in all counties nationwide to participate in a federal immigration program referred to as 287(g). Named after a section of the 1996 Immigration and Nationality Act, it authorizes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to delegate to state and local law enforcement officers specified immigration functions under ICE supervision.
Under the Biden administration, former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas limited 287(g) participation to a jail model, which the Texas bill follows.
The Trump administration expanded 287(g) to three models, a Jail Enforcement Model (JEM), Task Force Model (TFM) and Warrant Service Officer (WSO) model, The Center Square reported. Additional models may be rolled out in the future. ICE provides free training, saying it “bears the cost of 287(g) training for law enforcement agencies.”
As of May 29, law enforcement agencies in 40 states were participating in 287(g), with the greatest number of agreements signed in Florida, The Center Square reported.
Florida agencies are participating in all three models, including Florida’s 67 sheriff’s offices; roughly 90 police departments; multiple university police departments, including boards of trustees; county commissioners; airport police; multiple departments of corrections, among others. No other state has the level of participation that Florida does.
By comparison, 64 Texas sheriffs have signed at least one 287(g) agreement with ICE, as well as the Nixon Police Department, Texas National Guard and Texas Office of Attorney General. Applications are pending from four additional sheriffs, as of May 29 data.
Current sheriff participation represents roughly 27% of Texas’ 254 counties. The majority are counties with small populations with limited funds. Notably absent are the Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and other state agencies. By contrast, Democratic-led Arizona Department of Corrections and Massachusetts Department of Corrections are participating in the JEM.
Just because President Donald Trump has largely shut down illegal border crossings doesn’t mean law enforcement efforts are finished, ICE says. State and local law enforcement have “four years to eliminate cartel activities in our communities,” Goliad Sheriff Roy Boyd, who leads an Operation Lone Star Task Force in multiple counties, told The Center Square.
“The reason we need everybody to participate in 287(g) is pretty simple. The people that are in this country illegally are beholden to the cartels and their contractors. The only way to get rid of the cartel presence in the United States is to apprehend illegal aliens in our counties and state,” he said. “As long as those people are here, the cartels have the logistical means they need to conduct their business, whether that is their slave trade, moving drugs, moving money, stealing oil in the Permian Basin.”
Cartel operatives also adapting and changing their methods, he and others in the OLS Task Force told The Center Square. “The reason we formed the task force was to deny the cartels the ability to operate freely within the jurisdictions of task force members,” he said. Their efforts have so far proved successful, with cartel operatives going around task force counties to avoid being apprehended, The Center Square first reported.
In nearby Lavaca County, where the previous sheriff wouldn’t participate in task force operations, drug trafficking went unchecked until a new sheriff was elected and is now participating in the task force, The Center Square exclusively reported.
Law enforcement at the state and local levels need to prepare for the future expecting a Biden administration 2.0 to reverse Trump administration policies, task force members say.
Now that Trump’s in office, “We need to keep the momentum going,” founding task force member Brooks County Sheriff Benny Martinez told The Center Square. “Trump’s term is only four years, 48 months and it’s gone. We need to think ahead for the next term already. We’ve got to do it now because [border security] has to be sustained. We just can’t give that up.”
“When President Trump is out of office, if the next administration does not take the same strong stance against the cartels, the cartels will be right back up at full production across the United States, bringing their product over. This is our opportunity to defund the cartels’ operations in our counties and state, and eventually nationwide,” Boyd said.
The current bill “is a continuation of the Mayorkas model,” task force members said, excluding the field enforcement component. Without field enforcement, the Trump administration won’t have the support it needs, they argue.
Without weighing in on the specifics of the bill, Trump border czar Tom Homan advocates for a whole of government approach targeting criminal illegal foreign nationals.
“Law enforcement at the local, state and federal levels should all work together seamlessly to protect our communities from illegal alien public safety threats. It’s plain common sense,” he told The Center Square.

Read More

Law enforcement agencies in 40 states are partnering with ICE 287(g) program

Law enforcement agencies in 40 states are partnering with ICE 287(g) program

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is calling on law enforcement officials in all U.S. counties to participate in a federal program, 287(g). Those who do receive free training and resources, potentially federal grant money, and a partnership with the Trump administration to identify violent criminals illegally in the country, many of whom are already booked in their local and state jails.
The program is named after the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996, 8 USC 1357, Section 287(g)(1), which authorizes ICE to delegate to state and local law enforcement officers the authority to perform specified immigration functions only under ICE’s direction and supervision. Local law enforcement officers can apply to participate in the Jail Enforcement Model (JEM), Task Force Model (TFM) and Warrant Service Officer (WSO) model, The Center Square reported.
As of May 29, a record 635 memorandum of agreements (MOAs) for 287(g) have been signed with ICE in 40 states, with the number growing every day, according to ICE.
They include JEM agreements with 100 law enforcement agencies in 25 states, WSO agreements with 228 law enforcement agencies in 31 states, and TFM agreements with 307 agencies in 30 states.
Another 68 pending 287(g) applications have been filed with ICE, including seven JEMs, 18 WSOs and 43 TFMs, according to the data.
Florida leads all states with the number of agencies that have signed 287(g) MOAs. It is the only state to have every county sheriff’s office (67) participating in at least one 287(g) program; many counties are participating in all three.
Florida also has the greatest number of state agencies participating: Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles; Florida Division of Highway Patrol; Florida Department of Law Enforcement; Florida National Guard; Florida State Guard; departments of Environmental Protection, Financial Services, Lottery Services, Division of Alcohol, Beverages and Tobacco, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Gaming Control Commission.
Florida has the greatest number of police departments (roughly 90) that have signed MOAs with ICE, including Indian River Shores and Jupiter Island departments of public safety.
Florida’s the only state to have universities participating, including: the board of trustees from Florida A&M University and University of Central Florida; and the police departments of Florida Gulf Coast University, Florida Polytechnic University, Florida Southwestern State College, New College of Florida, Northwest Florida State College, Tallahassee State College, University of Florida, and University of West Florida.
Florida is the only state to have a county board of commissioners participating, the first do to so in the country is from Pasco County.
Florida is the only state to have airport police departments participating: Melbourne International Airport and Sanford Airport were the first to do so in the country.
In addition to the Florida Department of Corrections, correctional facilities in Jackson, Miami Dade, Orange, Osceola and Volusia counties are also participating.
Florida also has the greatest number of pending applications, including 22 police departments, another airport, two more universities and the Florida Department of Agriculture, as of May 29, according to the data.
Americans who want their sheriffs, local and state law enforcement agencies to participate in 287(g) can provide them with an ICE 287g fact sheet, 287g brochure, or participant map, ICE says. They can also contact their state legislators and governors to encourage state agencies, university police, airports and others to participate.

Read More

‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ includes billions for government AI programs

Poll: Democratic voters want their congressional leaders to fight Trump more

Congress’s gigantic reconciliation bill, which passed the U.S. House last month, includes billions of dollars for artificial intelligence and machine learning program investments.
The bill sets landmark goals for implementation of AI in government agencies, defense preparation and social services tracking.
The legislation allocates more than $1 billion in available funds until 2029 for procurement of artificial intelligence technology to combat drug trafficking at the United States’ northern, southern and maritime borders.
The government will allocate $500 million to replace legacy technology systems at the Commerce Department with AI. The investment will continue until 2034.
The aim for the investment is to “improve the cybersecurity posture of Federal information technology systems through modernized architecture, automated threat detection, and integrated artificial intelligence solutions,” according to the bill.
Several defense projects are expected to get upgrades through the increased AI investment. These investments include $450 million to use AI for naval shipbuilding, $150 million for AI-powered drones and $124 million to the Department of Defense’s test resource management center to further develop AI capabilities.
AI is also set to receive a $200 million investment boost until 2029 to expedite the audits of its financial statements. This investment comes after the Pentagon failed its seventh audit in a row in 2024.
Additionally, AI is expected to help reduce and recoup improper payments made through Medicare.
The Department of Health and Human Services reported an estimated $100 billion in improper payments in the Medicare and Medicaid programs in fiscal year 2023. That accounts for 43% of the government-wide total improper payments for that year, according to a report from U.S. Government Accountability Office.
The bill also imposes a 10-year ban on state and local governments from enforcing laws that would regulate the development of data centers powering artificial intelligence.
The bill said this effort is to “streamline licensing, permitting, routing, zoning, procurement, or reporting procedures in a manner that facilitates the adoption of artificial intelligence models” across the country.
U.S. Rep. James Comer, R.Ky., announced a hearing set for June 5 to further examine ways the government can invest in AI. The hearing is planned in response to President Trump’s Jan. 23 executive order on AI.
The hearing will examine the global landscape of artificial intelligence, focusing on the federal government deploying the technology to improve efficiency, reduce fraud and provide better customer services to the taxpayers.
“As AI adoption accelerates, the federal government needs to be prepared to deploy this transformative technology efficiently and effectively,” Comer said in a statement. “I look forward to working alongside my colleagues to unleash AI responsibly and ensure the federal government leads innovation while protecting the interests and rights of all Americans.”
While the bill has passed the House, revisions are expected in the Senate which could change amounts of federal investments in AI.

Read More

Poll: College not preparing students for workforce, managers avoid hiring them

Poll: College not preparing students for workforce, managers avoid hiring them

American colleges are not preparing students for the workforce, according to a recent poll, with hiring managers saying many graduates are entitled, easily offended, and on their phones too much.
A May release on the Resume.org poll said that “the class of 2025 college graduates [are] entering a difficult job market. Not only is there economic uncertainty, but hiring managers also express skepticism about the capabilities and professionalism of young workers joining the workforce.”
The poll was conducted in April by Resume.org – a website that helps with resume writing – and surveyed 1,000 hiring managers.
According to the poll, “8 in 10 hiring managers say a recent college graduate didn’t work out at their company in the past year, and 65% say they had to fire one.”
“Most companies (90%) say they hired recent college graduates in the past year,” the release said. “However, only 17% of those companies say all of these hires were successful.”
“The majority, 70%, say that only some of the hires worked out, and 13% say that only a few of their recent grad hires worked out,” while “1% say that none of them were successful,” the release said.
At 48%, the top issue for graduates at companies where it didn’t work out is a lack of motivation or initiative.
Other issues include a lack of professionalism at 39%, excessive phone use at 39%, poor time management at 38%, and an indifferent attitude at 37%.
“Poor communication skills, difficulty handling feedback, and an inability to adapt to company culture” are also issues for the young adults.
Workplace professionalism appears to be a problem in general for recent college graduates, according to managers.
The poll shows that 61% of managers say recent graduates are entitled or too easily offended, over half say they are unprepared for the workforce, and 87% say they are “often or sometimes on their phones during work days.”
“Tardiness is also a concern,” the release said. “66% say recent grads are late to start work often or sometimes, and 55% say they are late to meetings,” while “60% say they turn in assignments late.”
Additionally, the poll shows that “more than half (58%) of managers report that recent grads often or sometimes fail to dress appropriately, and 56% say they don’t always use proper workplace language.”
One in six of the managers polled “are reluctant to hire this cohort.”
“Only 58% of companies say they plan to hire from the graduating class of 2025, reflecting growing hesitation among employers,” the release said.
Resume.org career coach Irina Pichura said in the release: “Colleges don’t teach students how to behave in the workplace, and there is a lack of transitional support from both universities and employers.”
“Most students graduate with little exposure to professional environments, so when they arrive at their first job, they’re often learning basic workplace norms for the first time,” Pichura said.
“Colleges should have a workplace training program to support graduates’ transition to the workplace,” Pichura said.
Resume.org has not yet responded to The Center Square’s request for comment via an online contact form.

Read More

Truth in Accounting explains what the Moody’s downgrade really means for taxpayers

Truth in Accounting explains what the Moody's downgrade really means for taxpayers

When the U.S. lost its last AAA credit rating earlier this month, a nonprofit group that tracks government spending wasn’t surprised.
Truth in Accounting, which pushes for financial transparency across all levels of government, had already given the federal government its own grade: F.
The group uses a proprietary methodology that it says cuts through “politicization and accounting tricks” to give taxpayers a complete picture of government financial management.
According to the U.S. Department of Treasury, the nation’s debt stands at $36.2 trillion. Truth in Accounting, however, uses tougher standards. It pegs the nation’s true debt at $158.6 trillion, or about $974,000 for each federal taxpayer.
Most of the debt is from obligations, including $67.1 trillion in Medicare benefits and $51.6 trillion in Social Security benefits.
Sheila Weinberg, founder and CEO of Truth in Accounting, said Moody’s was late to the game.
“We always think those ratings are very generous,” she told The Center Square. “So obviously, we thought it was overdue.”
Moody’s downgraded the U.S. credit rating to AA1 earlier this month, projecting Congress won’t be able to reduce the nation’s growing debt. It was the last credit-rating agency to keep the U.S. at a top AAA rating. Fitch Ratings downgraded the U.S. in 2023, and S&P Global Ratings did so in 2011.
“Successive U.S. administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs,” Moody’s wrote in a statement. “We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration. Over the next decade, we expect larger deficits as entitlement spending rises while government revenue remains broadly flat.”
Moody’s evaluates risk for bondholders. Weinberg said Truth in Accounting evaluates financial management for taxpayers. Weinberg noted that credit rating agencies often take into account a government’s ability to raise taxes because those taxes can be used to pay back bondholders.
Weinberg said the federal government’s “financial condition has been horrible for decades, and it is just getting worse and worse and worse.” Without changing major cost drivers such as Medicare and Social Security, Congress can do little to fix the debt situation, Weinberg said.
“If you’re not going to touch [Social Security and Medicare], then you’re just playing with the deck chairs on the Titanic,” she said.
Weinberg said the only good thing to come from Moody’s rating decision was that more people might pay attention to the federal debt problem.
GOP members of the U.S. Senate have already raised concerns about the debt levels in the House-approved budget. Congress has run a budget deficit every year since 2001, which contributes to the nation’s overall debt profile.
In January, the federal government reported net costs of $7.4 trillion in fiscal year 2024, but it couldn’t fully account for its spending. The U.S. Government Accountability Office, which is Congress’s research arm, said that the federal government must address “serious deficiencies” in federal financial management and correct course on its “unsustainable” long-term fiscal path.

Read More

Prosecutors ask judge to sentence ex-Speaker Madigan to 12 ½ years in prison

Prosecutors ask judge to sentence ex-Speaker Madigan to 12 ½ years in prison

Capitol News Illinois

CHICAGO — Federal prosecutors are asking for a lengthy 12 ½-year prison sentence for former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, calling the longtime Democratic power broker “steeped in corruption” and alleging he lied on the witness stand when he testified in his own defense earlier this year.
In their 72-page filing Friday evening, prosecutors also called for a $1.5 million fine in addition to prison time for the 10 corruption charges — including bribery — on which Madigan was convicted in February.
Read more: Madigan guilty of bribery as split verdict punctuates ex-speaker’s fall
“The crimes charged and proven at trial demonstrate that Madigan engaged in corrupt activity at the highest level of state government for nearly a decade,” prosecutors wrote in their sentencing memorandum. “Time after time, Madigan exploited his immense power for his own personal benefit by trading his public office for private gain for himself and his associates, all the while carefully and deliberately concealing his conduct from detection.”
But in a competing filing published to the court docket two hours later, Madigan’s attorneys argued the former speaker should only serve five years’ probation, including a year of home detention followed by community service.
Madigan is scheduled to be sentenced June 13.
Along with Madigan’s legal arguments for no prison time, his attorneys also filed hundreds of pages of character letters asking U.S. District Judge John Blakey for leniency in sentencing, upon which Madigan’s lawyers bolstered their request.
“Throughout his 83-year life, Mike quite literally changed the lives of tens of thousands of people in his district on the south side of Chicago,” Madigan’s filing stated. “He positively impacted millions of people throughout the State of Illinois. The more than 200 letters submitted on Mike’s behalf demonstrate that this is not hyperbole.”
Madigan, who stepped away from public life in early 2021 as the feds’ investigation swirled around his inner circle, spent five decades in the Illinois House, including 36 as House speaker — the longest tenure of any legislative leader in the country. He also spent 23 years as head of the state’s Democratic Party, granting him even more power over Illinois’ political landscape.
Split verdict
After three months of testimony from more than 60 witnesses and dozens of hours of secretly recorded audio and video, a jury convicted Madigan on 10 of 23 counts he was facing. But jurors acquitted the former speaker on seven counts and deadlocked on another six, including an overarching racketeering charge.
The former speaker’s convictions involved alleged bribery from electric utility Commonwealth Edison, which hired five of the speaker’s allies on no-work contracts at various times from 2011 and 2019 — an eight-year period during which ComEd was pushing for major legislation in the General Assembly. The jury also convicted Madigan on supporting counts related to an alleged scheme to help get Chicago alderman-turned-FBI mole Danny Solis appointed to a lucrative state board position, though he was acquitted of the bribery charge pertaining to the same alleged scheme.
Read more: Madigan Trial in Review
Some of the trial’s most dramatic moments came in January, when Madigan made the stunning decision to testify in his own defense. The high-risk move opened him up to blistering cross-examination from lead prosecutor Amarjeet Bhachu, who left the U.S. Attorney’s office in March and isn’t a party to sentencing recommendations.
Over two days, Bhachu sparred with the former speaker, and weeks later he and his colleagues quoted Madigan’s testimony back to the jury during closing arguments in an attempt to prove he’d lied on the witness stand.
Read more: In contentious cross-examination, prosecutor accuses Madigan of not telling ‘the whole truth’ | Prosecutor calls Madigan, McClain ‘grand masters of corruption’ as case goes to jury
Prosecutors leaned on that alleged perjury once more in Friday’s sentencing memorandum, counting his “obstructive conduct” as a key justification for their sentencing recommendation.
“Madigan has expressed no remorse for his crimes, nor has he acknowledged the damage wrought by his conduct,” prosecutors wrote. “Indeed, Madigan went so far as to commit perjury at trial in an effort to avoid accountability, and he persists in framing his actions as nothing more than helping people.”

[caption id="attachment_69229" align="aligncenter" width="1140"] After a jury convicted former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan on 10 of 23 corruption charges on Feb. 12, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Julia Schwartz, Diane MacArthur, Sarah Streicker, and Amarjeet Bhachu stand behind then-acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois Morris Pasqual as he addresses reporters. (Capitol News Illinois photo by Hannah Meisel)[/caption]

Madigan repeatedly claimed — and his attorneys repeatedly argued — that he was ignorant of the fact that the collective $1.3 million his allies earned from their ComEd contracts was for performing no work. Instead, the former speaker and his lawyers framed those contracts as the result of mere job recommendations, which they argued was a core component of Madigan’s job as speaker.
But as a result of Madigan’s testimony, U.S. District Judge John Blakey reversed a pre-trial decision and allowed prosecutors to play a damning wiretapped phone call for the jury in which Madigan laughed about ComEd contractors having “made out like bandits.” In the call, the former speaker’s co-defendant, longtime Springfield lobbyist Mike McClain, laughed, too, replying, “for very little work.”
Read more: Jurors to hear tape of Madigan saying ComEd contractors ‘made out like bandits’
Prosecutors cited that call in its Friday filing as evidence the former speaker wasn’t forthcoming when he “testified that McClain never said he believed or suspected that any of the people that Madigan had referred to ComEd were not working.”
“This testimony was a lie,” the feds wrote in their filing.
Prosecutors also ripped Madigan’s attempts on the witness stand to distance himself from McClain, his longtime close friend and advisor, which the feds said “completely undermined” the former speaker’s “credibility as a witness.”
“The multitude of recorded conversations, emails, and documents presented at trial established a uniquely close and longstanding relationship of mutual dependence between Madigan and McClain and demonstrated that Madigan was lying when he tried to distance himself from his key operative,” prosecutors wrote.
“Madigan assigned McClain, and only McClain, to carry out the most sensitive assignments and requests and to engage in the most potentially politically explosive conversations when Madigan wanted bad news delivered, including to legislators who served under Madigan.”
Read more: ‘My client is the speaker’: Jury hears wiretapped calls of Madigan co-defendant, longtime friend | ComEd execs joked Madigan co-defendant was ‘double agent,’ utility’s former top lawyer testifies | Madigan co-defendant had unparalleled access to speaker, ex-top aide testifies
The jury in February deadlocked on all six counts pertaining to McClain, but he faces his own sentencing in July on charges related to the ComEd bribery scheme after a jury in May 2023 convicted him and three other ex-utility executives and lobbyists for their roles.
Plea for leniency
Of the more than 200 letters filed Friday with Madigan’s legal arguments for a non-custodial sentence, many came from former constituents or other Illinoisans who wrote about how the former speaker helped them in some way.
Letters also came from prominent faith leaders across the state, 40 former staffers, prominent labor leaders and three dozen former elected officials, among them several Republicans like former Gov. Jim Edgar. Attorneys also included an op-ed in support of Madigan penned by former GOP Gov. Jim Thompson before his death in 2020.
All four of Madigan’s children wrote lengthy letters, including former Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, whom the former speaker adopted after marrying her mother Shirley in 1976. In addition to writing about how Madigan operated in the world of Illinois government and politics that her adoptive father introduced her to, Lisa Madigan’s letter highlighted what the former speaker’s attorneys called “a key consideration” for Madigan’s sentencing: his wife’s health.
“Mike keeps my mother alive,” Lisa Madigan wrote in her letter, which said Shirley Madigan suffers from “a severe lung disease” and has “rarely been well enough to leave the house” in the last five years since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, as she’s “extremely susceptible to infections” and has been hospitalized three times.
“She is able to remain in their house primarily because of the care my father provides,” Lisa Madigan wrote. “He shops for groceries, brings her food (as you heard during the trial), does laundry, and generally takes care of her and their house.”
Lisa Madigan was referring to a lighthearted moment on one of the wiretapped calls played for the jury in which the then-speaker read a menu of soup options to his wife over the phone.
Madigan’s attorneys wrote that even “one day of imprisonment” for Madigan “will upend her (Shirley’s) entire life.”
“Mike presence is medically necessary to provide the direct assistance, supervision, and emotional support required to maintain Shirley’s well-being in a familiar home environment, which is paramount for patients with Shirley’s conditions,” the filing said, going on to refer to Madigan as Shirley’s “caretaker.”
The former speaker’s lawyers also referred to Madigan’s own age as a mitigating factor for sentencing, though leaned more heavily on kneecapping prosecutors’ arguments that a 12 ½-year sentence would serve as a deterrent.
“The defendant respectfully submits that a sentence of imprisonment would be greater than necessary to protect the public or deter him from criminal conduct,” the filing read. “Mike does not pose a risk of committing new crimes. He will never hold public office again.”
Madigan’s attorneys went on to detail “intense public embarrassment for (the former speaker) and his family,” which they argued “is a significant punishment in and of itself.” They also claimed the former speaker’s grandchildren “are teased at school” because of Madigan’s criminal case.
“As one example, Mike was publicly compared to a mob boss,” Madigan’s filing read. “Politicians also continue to use Mike as a cheap political shot, without any regard for his history of good works and positive impact on Illinois. … He will also live the rest of his years as a felon.”
Other notable letter-writers on Madigan’s behalf included former U.S. Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, former Illinois Supreme Court Justice Tom Kilbride, Democratic mega- fundraisers Michael Sacks and Fred Eychaner and Chicago Bulls and White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf. While many former Democratic allies of Madigan penned appeals to Judge Blakey, only a few currently hold office — among them state Reps. Marcus Evans, D-Chicago, and Curtis Tarver, D-Chicago, along with Auditor General Frank Mautino.
Several authors of Madigan’s character letters had testified in trial, including his former law partner Vincent “Bud” Getzendanner, whose time on the witness stand was spent trying to explain the ethical firewall the Madigan & Getzendanner real estate law firm had with official state business.
In his letter, Getzendanner joked that he was “pretty sure” Madigan was “only human” and also poked a hole in the longtime Springfield mythology Madigan’s daily lunchtime apple, which he said demonstrated the former speaker’s “famous willpower.”
“Strangely enough, on many occasions I subsequently found an unexplained residue of chocolate chip cookie crumbs on his plate,” Getzendanner wrote, later apologizing to the judge for his sense of humor.

Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
The post Prosecutors ask judge to sentence ex-Speaker Madigan to 12 ½ years in prison appeared first on Capitol News Illinois.

Read More

WATCH: No ‘shoddy steel from Shanghai’ says Trump

WATCH: No 'shoddy steel from Shanghai' says Trump

From a crowded mill in West Mifflin, Pa., on Friday, President Donald Trump said a $14 billion merger will shore up the American steel market and bolster national security.
He made the comments at a rally to celebrate the deal between U.S. Steel and Japanese-owned Nippon Steel, nearly 18 months after the foreign competitor first proposed the idea.
The development is an about-face for both the president and the former Biden administration, who both worried that unfair Chinese trade practices had made the domestic steel market unstable.

Read More

WATCH: Trump says D.C. ‘betrayals melted steel jobs away’

Poll: Democratic voters want their congressional leaders to fight Trump more

Six months ago, the mood in the Pittsburgh region was somber: after a year of waffling, former President Joe Biden dealt the final blow to U.S. Steel’s lucrative merger with a Japanese competitor, Nippon Steel.
After blocking the $14 billion deal over national security concerns, namely unfair trade practices on the foreign market, state and federal lawmakers from Pennsylvania had only one hope left: a change of heart from newly re-elected President Donald Trump.
Long opposed to the merger, the 47th president said Friday that Nippon agreed to make the largest investment in steel in history, while keeping the company under U.S. control.
It’s a triumphant moment for thousands of steel workers who fretted about the future of their jobs since 2023. In the intervening 18 months, labor unions and domestic competitors ratcheted up their own attempts to thwart the Nippon deal, alleging that the company would relocate Arkansas to avoid collective bargaining.
Late last year, U.S. Steel and Nippon filed joint lawsuits that claimed political influence tipped the scales against the merger.
In his comments Friday, Trump referenced decades of federal policy that contributed to the industry’s decline.

Read More

WATCH: Trump announces 50% tariff on imported steel

WATCH: Trump announces 50% tariff on imported steel

Imported steel and aluminum tariffs will double to 50% on Wednesday, says President Donald Trump.
He made the announcement just at Irvin Works, a U.S. Steel plant in West Mifflin, about 11 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, while celebrating the iconic company’s merger with Japanese-owned Nippon Steel.

Read More

Lawmakers unveil $55B spending plan with just 1 day left to pass it

Lawmakers unveil $55B spending plan with just 1 day left to pass it

Capitol News Illinois

SPRINGFIELD — Illinois Democrats introduced what a leading budgeteer described as a $55 billion budget Friday evening ahead of a Saturday deadline to pass the fiscal year 2026 spending plan.
The 3,363-page spending proposal was unveiled after 6 p.m. At the time the Senate’s lead budget negotiator, Sen. Elgie Sims, D-Chicago, briefed reporters on the plan; an exact proposal for raising about $1 billion in revenue to pay for it had not been made publicly available.
But Sims said lawmakers are not using broad tax hikes to balance the budget, although the plan does call for specific tax increases in certain areas. Sims said the proposal includes new taxes on gambling as well as tobacco and vape products. He also hinted that some businesses will pay more under the plan – though Illinois’ constitution mandates that the state corporate income tax remain a flat rate.
“We’re trying to make sure that individuals pay their fair share, and corporations, who are the most prosperous are most profitable, also pay their fair share,” Sims said.
Later, in a House hearing on the spending plan, Democratic Rep. Robyn Gabel, D-Evanston, said it relies upon $55.4 billion in revenue with $55.2 billion in spending. But at several points the chamber’s budget leaders declined to talk about revenue, noting that proposal will come before the committee later, likely on Saturday.
The plan is roughly in line with what Gov. JB Pritzker proposed in his February budget address as budget talks in Congress have injected uncertainty in state finances.

[caption id="attachment_69203" align="aligncenter" width="1140"] State Sen. Elgie Sims, a Chicago Democrat and the Senate’s lead budget negotiator, briefs reporters on the state budget Friday evening. The $55 billion spending measure was filed late Friday — one day before lawmakers were scheduled to adjourn. (Capitol News Illinois photo by Andrew Adams)[/caption]

“This budget recognizes that there are significant challenges that we have, that we will face, and it makes sure that the chaos that is coming out of Washington, we’re prepared for it,” Sims told reporters Friday night. “We’re not running away from our responsibility. We’re running towards it.”
A health care program that provides benefits to undocumented immigrants in Illinois between ages 42 and 64 also appears to be eliminated. Pritzker proposed eliminating the program to save the state $330 million.
“He did not include the HBIA (Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults) program in the budget,” Sims said. “But again, that’s in recognition of the challenges that we’re seeing coming out of Washington and the devastating effects that those proposals are having on our state and states across the country.”
Pritzker proposed a $55.2 billion spending plan in February, but revenue forecasts have declined since then. The latest estimate in early May from the governor’s office pegged FY26 revenue at $54.9 billion while the General Assembly’s independent Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability projected revenue would come in at $54.5 billion – $1 billion below Pritzker’s February revenue estimate.
Expected declines in federal funding and a diminishing economic outlook have caused the downward revisions.
But the yet-to-be-filed revenue plan would make up a little over $1 billion in revenue, according to Sims.
Read more: Pritzker calls $55.2 billion budget ‘responsible and balanced’ | Governor’s office cuts revenue projection by $500 million
Another source of new revenue in the budget proposal is a delinquent tax payment incentive program. The program is designed to help the state recuperate overdue tax payments. The program was proposed by Pritzker and is estimated to generate about $198 million in revenue.
With Medicaid funding cuts possible from Congress, Sims said the budget makes “significant” increases for the state’s hospital systems, in particular safety-net hospitals. He said the plan also builds in wage increases for direct service providers.
The state’s evidence-based funding model for K-12 schools calls for $350 million in additional funding each year, with a portion of that going to a property tax relief fund and the rest directly to schools. The proposed budget fully funds the K-12 education portion at $307 million but does not add $43 million in property tax relief funds, according to House Democratic leaders.
Republicans prodding House Democratic budget leaders for details during a late-night hearing said pausing the grant fails to deliver benefits to property owners.
“The taxpayers are begging and pleading for tax relief and then we put a program on pause?” Rep. John Cabello, R-Machesney Park, said. “Maybe we should look at all the different programs going to Democratic districts and stop those for a little bit instead of telling the taxpayers that there’s not going to be property tax relief.”
Republicans pressed on why House Democrats are set to get $1.5 million of spending for their districts while Senate Democrats are expecting $3 million of spending on districting projects – although Democrats wouldn’t confirm or deny those numbers.
Lawmakers will also see their salaries rise as part of the budget, going to a $98,304 base salary from roughly $92,000. That’s an annualized rate of increase that is set by law.
Editor’s note: This story was updated with more information on the budget from an evening House committee hearing.

Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
The post Lawmakers unveil $55B spending plan with just 1 day left to pass it appeared first on Capitol News Illinois.

Read More